1. **Analyze User Input:** – **Role:** Expert journalism editor – **Task:** Rewrite the provided news note to make it human, attractive, and without an AI tone. – **Constraints:** – DO NOT mention AI, IA, or technology. – Maintain a professional and direct tone. – Return ONLY the title and the rewritten note, with no explanations. – **Original Title:** Detectan foco de gusano barrenador en gatos abandonados en Cazones, Veracruz – **Original Body:** Contains video references (“Video 4 Video 5 Video 6”), details about the incident (Cabellal 3, Cazones), 6 abandoned newborn kittens with severe fly strike (gusano barrenador), up to 10 flies found on them, initial cleanup by a citizen, continued infestation, warning from Animal Protection Area about ineffective/dangerous home remedies (diesel, methylene blue, antiseptics), warning against amateur treatment, call to stop abandoning animals, source/photo: AVC. 2. **Identify Key Issues in Original:** – Clunky opening with “Video 4 Video 5 Video 6” (likely artifacts from a web page) – Somewhat dry, bureaucratic tone – Needs to be more engaging, human-centered, yet professional and direct – Must avoid AI-sounding phrasing (overly polished, generic, or formulaic) – Keep facts intact: location (Cabellal 3, Cazones, Veracruz), issue (fly strike/gusano barrenador in abandoned newborn kittens), response (Animal Protection alert, warnings against unsafe remedies, call against abandonment), source (AVC) 3. **Determine Tone & Style:** – Professional journalism: clear, factual, concise – Human & attractive: focus on the animals’ plight, the community response, and the serious warning, using active voice and natural phrasing – Direct: no fluff, straight to the point but with narrative flow – Avoid AI markers: no “es importante destacar”, “en conclusión”, “resulta evidente”, overly symmetrical sentences, or robotic transitions 4. **Draft – Title:** Keep it close to original but slightly more engaging if possible, or stick to the factual one. The original is fine for journalism. I’ll refine it slightly for impact without losing accuracy: *Detectan brote de gusano barrenador en gatos abandonados en Cazones, Veracruz* (or keep original: *Detectan foco de gusano barrenador en gatos abandonados en Cazones, Veracruz*) I’ll stick closely to the original but ensure it’s clean. 5. **Draft – Body (Mental Refinement):** Start with the discovery, context, urgency, warnings, and call to action. Remove video artifacts. Structure logically. *En la comunidad de Cabellal 3, en Cazones (Veracruz), se detectó un brote de gusano barrenador en seis gatitos recién nacidos que fueron encontrados abandonados. Al localizarlos, los animales presentaban una infestación severa: hasta diez moscas los acompañaban en un solo lugar.* *Una vecina intentó ayudar durante la noche, pero la situación no mejoró. Al día siguiente, la infestación seguía activa y amenazaba directamente la vida de los felinos. Ante esto, el Área de Protección Animal de Cazones emitió una alerta a la población.* *Las autoridades advierten con claridad: remedios caseros como diésel, azul de metileno o antisépticos comunes no matan las larvas y solo empeoran el cuadro. Intentar tratar las heridas sin supervisión veterinaria retrasa la atención adecuada y acelera el deterioro de los animales.* *El llamado es firme: el abandono de mascotas no solo es cruel, sino que genera riesgos sanitarios graves para la comunidad. Si encuentras animales en peligro, contacta a las autoridades competentes para que reciban el tratamiento especializado que necesitan.* *Fuente y foto: AVC* 6. **Check Against Constraints:** – Human, attractive, non-AI tone? Yes, flows naturally, uses active voice, focuses on facts and urgency without melodrama or robotic phrasing. – No mention of AI/technology? Checked. None. – Professional and direct? Yes, clear structure, factual, authoritative tone. – Only title and note? Yes. – Covers all key facts? Yes: location, 6 kittens, severe infestation, flies, citizen’s attempt, continued risk, official warning, dangerous
